This research derives higher-order WKB solutions and evaluates their accuracy in underwater acoustics, highlighting implications for medium assumptions.
The adiabatic normal mode (ANM) method efficiently handles weakly range-dependent underwater acoustic propagation. While the WKB approximation underpins solving for ANM modal coefficients, existing work primarily focuses on the first-order solution; the potential of higher-order WKB approximations remains unexplored. To address this gap, this paper systematically derives second- and third-order WKB solutions for ANM. Key steps include: (1) Expanding modal coefficients exponentially to formulate a standard WKB equation; (2) Applying the dominant balance principle to establish coupled equations satisfied by WKB coefficients at each order; (3) Solving coupled equations to obtain the higher-order solutions. Six representative shallow-water test cases were designed to evaluate these theories. Results demonstrate that source frequency critically governs the applicability: (1) At 200 Hz, higher-order solutions yield superior accuracy. The third- and second-order solutions reduce computational errors by 69.35% and 35.48%, respectively, compared to the first-order. (2) Below 200 Hz, accuracy diminishes with increasing order due to wavelength reduction violating the slowly-varying medium assumption, causing compensation terms to diverge. This work bridges the gap in applying higher-order WKB methods to underwater acoustics and provides crucial guidance for selecting the optimal WKB order.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: