Mixed-methods study investigates safety design features in adolescent crisis units, suggesting AI can enhance outcomes.
Limited research has examined safety features in nonhospital settings for adolescents experiencing behavioral health crises, including the crisis stabilization unit (CSU). This mixed-methods study investigated safety through design features (eg, open versus semi-enclosed nursing stations) in an adolescent CSU with experts (clinicians and health care designers) and design trainees (N = 17) using physical mock-up simulations and artificial intelligence (AI). Participants' feedback was obtained using questionnaires and focus groups. Simulations were video-recorded, manually coded, and an AI-driven tool was developed for automatic, real-time analysis of videos. Findings revealed that experts rated the semi-enclosed nursing station higher in visibility, whereas design trainees reported significantly higher perceived privacy in the open nursing station (P = 0.036). AI-driven video analyses demonstrated high-accuracy performance in detecting and tracking participants (>80%) when compared with manual data. This study proposed a methodology to improve safety in future adolescent CSUs by integrating AI-driven tools and clinical mock-up simulations during the design process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jafarifiroozabadi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: