A cultural semiotics analysis reveals the evolution of pine-cypress as a moral symbol in Chinese tradition, indicating a complex interplay of meaning.
This study tackles a key question in cultural semiotics: How does a natural entity become a core moral symbol? Focusing on pine–cypress symbolism in Chinese thanatological culture, we propose a novel four-tier semiotic encoding model – comprising material, logographic, institutional, and ethical dimensions – to theorize its millennia-long metamorphosis. Critically synthesizing Ye Shuxian’s N-level coding with Peircean–Saussurean semiotics and Foucauldian–Bourdieusian power analysis, we argue that this process is dialectical, not linear: each tier interacts with and transforms the others. Our analysis reveals that materiality (e.g., Sanxingdui bronze trees) provides the sensual foundation; the logographic (e.g., the mu radical) enables conceptual abstraction; institutions (e.g., Zhouli texts) discipline the symbol into a tool of social hierarchy; and finally, ethical praxis (e.g., Confucian analogical thinking) creatively appropriates it for moral interiority. Cross-cultural comparison with Roman and Nordic arboreal symbols highlights China’s unique trajectory, where state power, textual canonization, and literati agency fused material durability with ethical perpetuity. This study offers a robust, non-Eurocentric paradigm for analyzing how culture dynamically constructs meaning through the interplay of objects, texts, power, and human imagination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: