Key result
Spironolactone linked to ~97% higher odds of early eGFR drop but lower overall CV risk.
Why the study?
The frequency, prognostic relevance, and implications of early acute eGFR changes after MRA initiation in patients with HFpEF were less known.
Does spironolactone reduce cardiovascular death, HF hospitalization, or aborted cardiac arrest in patients with HFpEF, irrespective of early acute eGFR changes?
Cohort (n=1,648)
Randomized
Yes
Does spironolactone reduce cardiovascular death, HF hospitalization, or aborted cardiac arrest in patients with HFpEF, irrespective of early acute eGFR changes?
In patients with HFpEF, spironolactone improves cardiovascular outcomes regardless of early acute eGFR declines, indicating that an early eGFR dip should not automatically lead to MRA discontinuation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early eGFR dips should not prompt automatic spironolactone discontinuation in HFpEF; extends RASi/SGLT2i observations to MRAs in this population.
Background and Aims Early acute changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) have been well described with renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, but less is known about the frequency, prognostic relevance, and implications of these changes after mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) initiation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods We performed a post-hoc analysis of 1,648 patients enrolled in the TOPCAT Americas region, defining an early eGFR dip as a ≥15% decrease in eGFR between baseline and week 4. Landmark analyses assessed the association of eGFR changes, treatment, and cardiovascular death, HF hospitalization, or aborted cardiac arrest. Results Within 4 weeks of treatment initiation, 431 (26%) patients experienced acute eGFR decrease with a higher proportion of patients assigned to spironolactone (269 [33%]) compared with placebo (162 [20%]) (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.58-2.47). An acute eGFR decrease was independently associated with higher risk of subsequent cardiovascular outcomes, irrespective of treatment arm. However, treatment with spironolactone appeared beneficial in reducing the primary cardiovascular outcome irrespective of the presence (HR 0.75 [0.53-1.08]) or absence (0.80 [0.64-1.00]) of early eGFR decrease (pinteraction=0.81). At any given magnitude of eGFR decline, risk of the primary endpoint was consistently lower with spironolactone compared with placebo (pinteraction=0.64). Conclusions Early acute eGFR changes were common and adversely prognostic in patients with HFpEF. Spironolactone treatment was beneficial in improving cardiovascular outcomes, despite a modest increase in the likelihood of acute eGFR decrease. An acute eGFR decrease early after MRA initiation should not automatically prompt treatment discontinuation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beldhuis et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=1,648). Spironolactone vs. Placebo was evaluated on acute eGFR decrease (≥15% decrease between baseline and week 4) (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.58-2.47). Spironolactone increased the likelihood of an early acute eGFR decrease compared to placebo (33% vs 20%; OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.58-2.47), but reduced cardiovascular outcomes irrespective of this decrease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: