PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2026Excellence in Pediatrics Abstracts0 citations

Diabetes and Deprivation Index; Assessment of Changes Over Time in Control and Therapeutics

View Full Paper
HGHarry GleesonJFJason ForanAMAlison McCaffrey

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the relationship between socioeconomic status and diabetes control among pediatric patients over time.
  • Data extraction from clinic records of patients at University Hospital Limerick from 2024 to 2025.
  • Analysis of the 2022 Pobal HP Deprivation Index to measure geographical deprivation.
  • Use of paired and multivariate panel analysis to relate glycaemic control and other variables.
  • Average HbA1c increased by 0.21% for the most deprived group, while others saw declines.
  • Time in Range worsened by -4.51% for the most deprived, while improving for others.
  • Overall DKA rates fell across all groups, independent of deprivation.
  • Insulin pump therapy usage increased slightly in both deprivation groups, but more slowly in the most deprived.
  • Pump therapy commencement was a key factor in HbA1c improvement, reducing levels significantly.

Abstract

Aim: To assess how differences in socioeconomic status are related to diabetes control and access to/uptake of therapeutics over time in an Irish paediatric diabetes centre. Method: Data was extracted from a review of the scanned clinic records of of all patients under the active care of University Hospital Limericks (UHL) paediatric diabetes service from 2024 to 2025. Data was cross referenced with the 2022 Pobal HP Deprivation Index, an Irish measure of geographical deprivation derived from multiple social and econonic variables updated every 5 years. Paired and multivariate panel analysis was performed to relate glycaemic control (HbA1c and Time in Range TIR), diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), listing on the hospital at risk program (HARP) which necessitates closer management of higher risk patients, treatment regimen and deprivation. Results: Data of 218 patients with data in 2024 and 2025. Average HbA1c rose for those from the most deprived areas, 0.21% (p=0.19) while other groups fell -0.01% to -0.30%. TIR also disimproved for the most deprived group, -4.51% (p=0.13), while improving for all other groups (+0.05% to +1.77%). Rates of DKA fell dramatically across all groups from 2024 to 2025, this was independent of deprivation group. The proportion of patients in the most deprived group using insulin pump therapy increased from 40% to 42.5%, usage for the least deprived increased from 59.1% to 63.6%. In panel analysis, the primary explanatory factor for change in HbA1c between 2024 and 2025 was commencement of insulin pump therapy, those who commenced pump therapy saw a fall in HbA1c of -1.2% (p<0.01) controlling for all other variables. Once insulin regimen was accounted for, there was no statistically significant difference between deprivation groups. HbA1c for those on pump therapy was 1.00% (p<0.01) lower than non-pump therapy in 2024 and 0.95% (p<0.01) lower in 2025. Conclusion: Average glycaemic control showed an overall improvement in this cohort with the exception of those from the most deprived areas. Differences in access to and uptake of pump therapy were found to exist with slower uptake of pump therapy in the most deprived group. These differences are the most important contributory factor to glycaemic control differences, whether measured by HbA1c or Time in Range. Common reasons for not commencing insulin pump therapy may be issues with compliance, emergency contingency planning, and potential issues with financial resources to facilitate a higher number of clinic visits and education sessions. This study suggests potential value from an exploration into factors affecting pump access and uptake in lower socioeconomic groups and potential additional resource allocation to address these health inequalities. A specific analysis of the significant drop in DKA admissions over the reference period also warrants futher investigation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gleeson et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db37774fe01fead37c5824https://doi.org/10.66584/eip2025-345
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 16281 First year of care in type 1 diabetes- are socioeconomic factors a key influence?2024
  2. 2Social Determinants of Health Impact on Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes Outcomes Early after Diagnosis2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Associations of Area-Level and Parental Individual-Level Social Deprivation with Glycemic Control over Time among Children with Type 1 Diabetes in France: A Longitudinal Cohort Study2024 · 5 citations
  4. 4Impact of Removing Restrictive Haemoglobin A1C Eligibility Criteria for Insulin Pump Therapy Funding for Children With Type 1 Diabetes in Ontario, Canada2026
  5. 5Persistent disparities in insulin pump uptake despite a universal pump programme for type 1 diabetes in Ontario, Canada2024 · 8 citations