Cross-sectional study identifies risk factors for developmental delays in preterm infants, suggesting effective screening strategies.
Introduction: Preterm birth is associated with increased risks of long-term neurodevelopmental impairments. Early developmental screening in real-world neonatal follow-up clinics is essential. The ASQ-3 Thai offers a practical, parent-completed tool; however, evidence of its performance in Thai preterm infants in everyday care settings remains limited. Objectives: To determine the prevalence and perinatal risk factors of suspected developmental delay in preterm infants <34>weeks' gestation screened with the ASQ-3 Thai in a neonatal follow-up clinic, and to explore its pragmatic diagnostic value compared with expert assessment in routine clinical practice. Methods: This hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in a neonatal follow-up outpatient clinic. Caregivers of eligible preterm infants aged 2–30 months completed the ASQ-3 Thai and a demographic questionnaire. Perinatal data were retrieved from medical records. Infants with abnormal screening results were referred to developmental-behavioral pediatricians for comprehensive clinical evaluation including TEDA4I. Results: Seventy-six infants were enrolled. Suspected developmental delay based on abnormal ASQ-3 Thai screening was found in 22.4% (17/76). Fine motor and problem-solving domains were most frequently affected. Abnormal screening was significantly associated with lower gestational age, lower birth weight, prolonged oxygen therapy, longer hospitalization, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Among screen-positive infants, 11 had confirmed neurodevelopmental disorders, yielding a positive predictive value of 79%. Conclusion: In a neonatal follow-up clinic, developmental problems were common among preterm infants <34>weeks, particularly in those with identifiable perinatal risks. The ASQ-3 Thai demonstrated good pragmatic value as a feasible, parent-completed screening tool to prioritize preterm infants for specialist evaluation and early intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kosan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: