Field experiment demonstrates improved wheat yield and ion balance in saline soils with drainage and aeration.
Shallow groundwater in saline soils creates a self-reinforcing cycle where waterlogging-induced root hypoxia impairs the ATP-dependent sodium exclusion mechanisms that plants rely on for salt tolerance. We conducted a two-year field experiment to test whether subsurface drainage must precede root-zone aeration for oxygen delivery to be effective. The experimental site was located in Heyang County, Weinan City, on the Guanzhong Plain of Shaanxi Province, north-central China—a major alluvial agricultural region representative of shallow-groundwater-induced salinization. The site had saturated paste electrical conductivity of 6.0 dS m−1 and groundwater depth fluctuating between 0.5 and 1.4 m. A randomized complete block design with 2 × 2 factorial arrangement compared four treatments: control (CK), subsurface drainage only (SD), root-zone aeration only (RA), and both interventions combined (SD + RA). Drainage increased air-filled porosity from 5.8% to 13.5%, crossing the 10.2% threshold (95% CI: 9.1–11.3%) where gas-phase continuity emerges according to segmented regression analysis. Without drainage, aeration achieved only 4.2 mg L−1 dissolved oxygen with high spatial variability (CV 12.5%), while the combined treatment reached 6.8 mg L−1 (CV 6.8%). Root ATP content increased by 89% in SD + RA compared to control, accompanied by 56% lower root Na+ and 185% higher K+/Na+ ratio. These physiological changes correlated with 31% higher grain yield (7580 vs. 5798 kg ha−1). The synergy index of 1.40 (95% CI: 1.28–1.52) indicated that combined effects exceeded the sum of individual treatments by 40%. Methane emissions declined by 62%, and the system achieved a 2.9-year payback period with a benefit–cost ratio of 4.08. These results establish drainage as a physical prerequisite for effective oxygenation, providing a mechanistic explanation for the variable performance of aeration systems reported in previous studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: