This longitudinal analysis explores institutional hypocrisy through the clown-mask in Böll and Rushdie, suggesting a critical framework.
This article proposes a structuralist comparative analysis of the "clown-mask" as a diagnostic tool for institutional hypocrisy in Heinrich Böll’s Ansichten eines Clowns (1963) and Salman Rushdie’s Shalimar the Clown (2005). Utilizing the classical Sanskrit framework of Rasa Theory (Natyashastra), the study maps the transition of the protagonists—Hans Schnier and Noman Sher—from an aesthetic "Golden Mean" to the detrimental extremes of Shanta (Quietism) and Raudra (Fury). Originally conceptualized in 2008, this longitudinal study serves as the primary record of this interdisciplinary architecture, asserting the sovereignty of the aesthetic over localized institutional constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharmila Shankar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: