What question did this study set out to answer?

April 12, 2026Journal of the American Geriatrics SocietyOpen Access

Operationalizing a Decision‐Making for Adverse Event Reporting Toolkit ( DART ) for Aging and Serious Illness Research

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

The aim is to address challenges in adverse event reporting in aging and serious illness research through a new toolkit.
Developed the DART toolkit specifically for serious illness research.
Designed for application in various populations and intervention types.
Planned future pilot testing for implementation and refinement.
DART shows promise as a solution for reporting challenges.
Potential applicability beyond seriously ill older adults.

Implication

DART enhances adverse event reporting in aging and serious illness research, suggesting broad applicability for diverse populations.

Abstract

DART provides a novel solution to AE reporting challenges faced by aging and serious illness researchers. While its design centers on seriously ill older adults, DART can likely be applied to research in any population and intervention type not regulated by the FDA. Future pilot testing will inform implementation.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Lubetsky et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db37f94fe01fead37c6232 https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70373

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

DART enhances adverse event reporting in aging and serious illness research, suggesting broad applicability for diverse populations.

Operationalizing a Decision‐Making for Adverse Event Reporting Toolkit ( DART ) for Aging and Serious Illness Research

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Operationalizing a Decision‐Making for Adverse Event Reporting Toolkit ( DART ) for Aging and Serious Illness Research

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading