Systematic review and meta-analysis estimates incidence of urinary retention in gynecologic surgery, implying procedure-specific strategies are needed.
Background: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a frequent complication after gynecologic surgery, with wide variability in reported incidence due to differences in procedures and outcome definitions, and a lack of standardized quantitative synthesis. Objective: To estimate the incidence of POUR following gynecologic surgery and summarize associated risk factors and preventive strategies. Methods: A PRISMA-based systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO, and ScienceDirect. The review protocol was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF; DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/W8CYR). Random-effects models were applied to estimate pooled incidence, with subgroup analyses by procedure and POUR definition. Associated factors were synthesized narratively. Results: Thirty-four studies including 20,466 patients were analyzed. The pooled incidence of POUR was 16.1% (95% CI 12.8– 20.1; I 2 = 97.3%). Incidence was highest after pelvic organ prolapse surgery (30.9%) and sling/mid-urethral sling procedures (25.3%), and lowest after minimally invasive benign hysterectomy (3.7%). Increased risk was associated with baseline voiding dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, vaginal surgical approach, and opioid exposure, while minimally invasive techniques and selected perioperative strategies were protective. Conclusion: POUR is a common, procedure-dependent complication of gynecologic surgery. Procedure-specific risk stratification and standardized perioperative pathways are needed to reduce POUR and improve postoperative recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasanah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: