Why the study?
Current therapies for myocardial infarction fail to adequately regenerate lost myocardium, and therapies inducing cardiomyocyte proliferation face challenges with minimal renewal, cardiomegaly, tumorigenesis, and defining true cell division.
This review highlights the methodological challenges and recent advances in distinguishing true cardiomyocyte division from DNA synthesis in efforts to regenerate the adult heart after injury.
Warrants caution against clinical translation of proliferation strategies; leaves open rigorous methods to confirm true cardiomyocyte division.
Cardiac diseases such as myocardial infarction (MI) can lead to adverse remodeling and impaired contractility of the heart due to widespread cardiomyocyte death in the damaged area. Current therapies focus on improving heart contractility and minimizing fibrosis with modest cardiac regeneration, but MI patients can still progress to heart failure (HF). There is a dire need for clinical therapies that can replace the lost myocardium, specifically by the induction of new myocyte formation from pre-existing cardiomyocytes. Many studies have shown terminally differentiated myocytes can re-enter the cell cycle and divide through manipulations of the cardiomyocyte cell cycle, signaling pathways, endogenous genes, and environmental factors. However, these approaches result in minimal myocyte renewal or cardiomegaly due to hyperactivation of cardiomyocyte proliferation. Finding the optimal treatment that will replenish cardiomyocyte numbers without causing tumorigenesis is a major challenge in the field. Another controversy is the inability to clearly define cardiomyocyte division versus myocyte DNA synthesis due to limited methods. In this review, we discuss several studies that induced cardiomyocyte cell cycle re-entry after cardiac injury, highlight whether cardiomyocytes completed cytokinesis, and address both limitations and methodological advances made to identify new myocyte formation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: