Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) remote sensing (RS) technology is an ideal tool to map flooded areas on account of its all-time, all-weather imaging capability. Existing SAR data-based change detection approaches lack well-discriminant change indices for reliable floodwater mapping. To resolve this issue, an unsupervised change detection approach, made up of two main steps, is proposed for detecting floodwaters from bi-temporal SAR data. In the first step, an improved wavelet-fusion flood-change index (IWFCI) is proposed. The IWFCI modifies the mean-ratio change index (CI) to fuse it with the log-ratio CI using the discrete wavelet transform (DWT). The IWFCI also employs a discriminant feature derived from the co-flood image to enhance the separability between the non-flood and flood areas. In the second step, an uncertainty-sensitive Markov random field (USMRF) model is proposed to diminish the over-smoothness issue in the areas with high uncertainty based on a new Gaussian uncertainty term. To appraise the efficacy of the floodwater detection approach proposed in this study, comparative experiments were conducted in two stages on four datasets, each including a normalized difference water index (NDWI) and pre-and co-flood Sentinel-1 data. In the first stage, the proposed IWFCI was compared to a number of state-of-the-art (SOTA) CIs, and the second stage compared USMRF to the SOTA change detection algorithms. From the experimental results in the first stage, the proposed IWFCI, yielding an average F-score of 86.20%, performed better than SOTA CIs. Likewise, according to the experimental results obtained in the second stage, the USMRF model with an average F-score of 89.27% outperformed the comparative methods in classifying non-flood and flood classes. Accordingly, the proposed floodwater detection approach, combining IWFCI and USMRF, can serve as a reliable tool for detecting flooded areas in SAR data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohsenifar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: