Key result
PCSK9 inhibitors cut LDL-C by ~55% on statins, with monoclonal antibodies reducing cardiovascular outcomes.
Why the study?
Do PCSK9-directed therapies reduce LDL-C and ASCVD risk in higher-risk patients?
Do PCSK9-directed therapies reduce LDL-C and ASCVD risk in higher-risk patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PCSK9-directed therapies provide substantial LDL-C reduction (50-60%) and are recommended for higher-risk patients with ASCVD or familial hypercholesterolemia.
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels is a primary strategy to reduce ASCVD risk. Although statin therapy remains the initial therapy of choice to reduce LDL-C and ASCVD risk, statin intolerance and suboptimal LDL-C lowering response prompts the need for additional non-statin therapies. Ezetimibe and bempedoic acid are reasonable options but they modestly reduce LDL-C levels (15% to 25%). Therapies directed at the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) enzyme, however, reduce LDL-C levels by 50%-60% when added to background statin therapy. PCSK9 is an enzyme synthesized by the liver that facilitates the degradation of LDL receptors and prevents their recycling to the hepatocyte surface to remove LDL-C from circulation. Approaches to inhibit this effect have centered on monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (alirocumab, evolocumab) targeting PCSK9 functionality and small interfering RNA (siRNA) therapies (inclisiran) targeting the hepatic synthesis of PCSK9. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated beneficial cardiovascular outcomes of PCSK9 mAbs, but such evidence is not yet available for inclisiran. Current clinical practice guidelines generally recommend PCSK9-directed therapies for higher-risk patients with established ASCVD and those with familial hypercholesterolemia. This approach is, in part, due to their cost and uncertain economic value, but also because these therapies require subcutaneous administration, which is not preferred by some patients. Oral therapies targeting PCSK9 are, however, in development. This scoping review covers the development of current and emerging PCSK9-directed therapies, their efficacy, safety, and role in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garwood et al. (2024) conducted a review in Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). PCSK9-directed therapies was evaluated. PCSK9-directed therapies reduce LDL-C levels by 50%-60% when added to background statin therapy, with monoclonal antibodies demonstrating beneficial cardiovascular outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: