Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cadaveric anatomy displays marked differences to in vivo anatomy, with the absence of living vascular dynamics affecting vessel diameters in cadaveric specimens. Blood vessels are of greater measurable calibre in cadaveric specimens than in the living. Consequently, cadaveric anatomy should be interpreted with consideration of post-mortem changes, while living anatomical studies, particularly with the use of imaging technologies, should be embraced in anatomical research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rozen et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: