A brief historical review has been made of the values assigned to the binding energy of C 1s electrons from hydrocarbon contamination on sample surfaces. The particular energy calibration technique used for each electron spectrometer on which the C 1s determination was made has been identified. There are notable variations in the C 1s electron binding energy for a hydrocarbon contamination layer with respect to the substrate on which it was measured. The possible source and nature of adventitious carbon have been discussed, as have factors which can affect its C 1s binding energy value. Sodium phosphate salts have been used to illustrate the relative merits of using an internal energy reference line rather than the C 1s electrons from the adventitious carbon layers of these salts. Alternative energy referencing techniques, which include deposition of soot from a candle flame and deliberate ‘ in situ ’ condensation of a volatile organic compound onto the sample surface, have been compared with the method under review. Another possible method is the mixing of powdered samples with reference compounds (e.g. graphite). It is concluded that, although the use of C 1s electrons from adventitious carbon layers is often a convenient method of energy referencing, interpretation of binding energy data obtained should be treated with caution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
P. Swift (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: