Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ni–La catalyst supported on SiO2 (Ni–La/SiO2) synthesized using in situ glycine–nitrate combustion was analyzed for catalyst dispersion at various catalyst-to-support ratios and support surface areas. Catalytic activity of the catalyst was assessed for methane cracking. The catalyst with higher support loading had a better catalyst dispersion. The use of a support with high surface area also improved catalyst dispersion. Ni–La/SiO2 B synthesized using a support with high surface area have a higher catalyst dispersion than that of Ni–La/SiO2 A with a support of low surface area. As a result, Ni–La/SiO2 B had a better methane conversion (the maximum of ∼60%) than that of Ni–La/SiO2 A (∼40%) and offered a higher H2 yield. Moreover, Ni–La/SiO2 B was found to be active for carbon formation. Nevertheless, the catalyst remained catalytically active for methane cracking without deactivation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tajuddin et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: