A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research

Guowei Li; Luciana Patrícia Fernandes Abbade; Ikunna Nwosu; Yanling Jin; Alvin Leenus; Muhammad Maaz; Mei Wang; Meha Bhatt; Laura Zielinski; Nitika Sanger; Bianca Bantoto; Candice Luo; Ieta Shams; Hamnah Shahid; Yaping Chang; Guangwen Sun; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Zainab Samaan; Mitchell Levine; Jonathan D. Adachi; Lehana Thabane

doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0459-5

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Abstract

This scoping review revealed that abstracts are frequently inconsistent with full reports, and efforts are needed to improve the consistency of abstract reporting in the primary biomedical community.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc1f491392b1172895519b https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0459-5

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research

Ask about this paper

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research

Ask about this paper

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading