The underlying basis of many psychological interventions is self-awareness. Systematic self-reflection enhances self-awareness, which improves self-monitoring, self-correction, and ultimately self-regulation (Kirschenbaum, 1997 Kirschenbaum, D. (1997). Mind matters: 7 steps to smarter sport performance. Carmel, IN: Cooper Publishing. [Google Scholar]). Theoretically, the capability to self-reflect following performance has motivational, cognitive, and behavioral effects (Ellis, Carette, Anseel, & Lievens, 2014 Ellis, S., Carette, B., Anseel, F., & Lievens, F. (2014). Systematic reflection: Implications for learning from failures and successes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 67–72. doi:10.1177/0963721413504106[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), increases intrinsic motivation, and results in more internal and controllable attributions (Allen, Jones, & Sheffield, 2010 Allen, M. S., Jones, M. V., & Sheffield, D. (2010). The influence of positive reflection on attributions, emotions, and self-efficacy. The Sport Psychologist, 24(2), 211–226. doi:10.1123/tsp.24.2.211[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). This paper introduces a tool—the Post-Event Reflection (PER)—that practitioners can use to assist athletes in processing their performances in a productive, improvement-focused manner. The PER’s conceptual and empirical rationale, practical implementation and implications, benefits, and challenges are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chow et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: