Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We consider a standard splitting algorithm for the rare-event simulation of overflow probabilities in any subset of stations in a Jackson network at level n, starting at a fixed initial position. It was shown in [8] that a subsolution to the Isaacs equation guarantees that a subexponential number of function evaluations (in n) suffices to estimate such overflow probabilities within a given relative accuracy. Our analysis here shows that in fact O(n^2\βV+1) function evaluations suffice to achieve a given relative precision, where \βV is the number of bottleneck stations in the subset of stations under consideration in the network. This is the first rigorous analysis that favorably compares splitting against directly computing the overflow probability of interest, which can be evaluated by solving a linear system of equations with O(nᵈ) variables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blanchet et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: