PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2009Journal of Applied Psychology1,487 citationsOpen Access

Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research.

View Full Paper
UHUte R. HülshegerMaastricht UniversityNANeil AndersonNorthwestern UniversityJSJesús F. SalgadoUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This article presents a meta-analysis of team-level antecedents of creativity and innovation in the workplace. Using a general input-process-output model, the authors examined 15 team-level variables researched in primary studies published over the last 30 years and their relation to creativity and innovation. An exhaustive search of the international innovation literature resulted in a final sample (k) of 104 independent studies. Results revealed that team process variables of support for innovation, vision, task orientation, and external communication displayed the strongest relationships with creativity and innovation (rhos between 0.4 and 0.5). Input variables (i.e., team composition and structure) showed weaker effect sizes. Moderator analyses confirmed that relationships differ substantially depending on measurement method (self-ratings vs. independent ratings of innovation) and measurement level (individual vs. team innovation). Team variables displayed considerably stronger relationships with self-report measures of innovation compared with independent ratings and objective criteria. Team process variables were more strongly related to creativity and innovation measured at the team than the individual level. Implications for future research and pragmatic ramifications for organizational practice are discussed in conclusion.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hülsheger et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc32a94f901957bec0fb87https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015978
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper