Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In order to titrate the dependence of individual steps in protein transport on signal peptide hydrophobicity, we have examined a series of mutants which involve replacement of the hydrophobic core segment of the Escherichia coli alkaline phosphatase signal peptide. The core regions vary in composition from 10:0 to 0:10 in the ratio of alanine to leucine residues. Thus, a nonfunctional polyalanine-containing signal peptide is titrated with the more hydrophobic residue, leucine. Analysis of this series identified a midpoint for rapid precursor processing between alanine to leucine ratios of 6:4 and 5:5 [Doud et al. (1993): Biochemistry 32:1251-1256]. Examination of precursors that are processed more slowly indicates a lower limit of signal peptide hydrophobicity that permits membrane association and translocation. Analysis of precursors that are processed rapidly defines an intermediate range of hydrophobicity that is optimum; above this level precursors become insensitive to transport inhibitors such as sodium azide and carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) in parallel with substantial inhibition of beta-lactamase processing. Our data indicate that there is a surprisingly narrow range of signal peptide hydrophobicity which both supports transport of the protein to which it is attached and which does not have such a high affinity for the transport pathway that it disrupts the appropriate balance of other secreted proteins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rusch et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: