Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract The “visible” proton‐conducting pathway offers a distinct advantage for researching the mechanism of proton conducting materials at the molecular level and developing new materials. To achieve this, three crystalline materials are constructed via acid–base chemistry based on phosphomolybdic acid and diversfied guanidine, namely, (CN 3 H 6 ) 6 (PMo 12 O 40 ) 2 ·H 2 O (GH–PMo 12 ), (CN 4 H 7 ) 3 (PMo 12 O 40 )·H 2 O (AGH–PMo 12 ), and (CN 5 H 8 ) 3 (PMo 12 O 40 )·3.5H 2 O (DAGH–PMo 12 ). Proton conductivity of GH–PMo 12 in the 001 direction reaches up to 0.19 S cm −1 at 85 °C and 98% RH, as elucidated by impedance studies of single crystals. The clear proton transport path is proposed through the analysis of single crystal structure. Moreover, impedance studies of powder crystals reveal that the proton conductivity of GH–PMo 12 is higher than that of the other two compounds. The underlying reasons for this result are clarified through the analysis of the pK a , proton density, and spatial structure. Additionally, GH–PMo 12 is fabricated into composite membrane with a peak proton conductivity of 5.31 × 10 −2 S cm −1 , which exhibits promising potential for real‐world applications.
Wang et al. (Mon,) studied this question.