Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 1, 1975Psychological Bulletin

Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AGAnthony G. GreenwaldEducational Testing Service

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Mathematical modeling demonstrates elevated rates of false-positive claims in psychological research, highlighting systemic publication bias against the null hypothesis.

Key Points

  • To evaluate the systematic consequences of prejudice against accepting the null hypothesis across researcher behavior and editorial decision-making in psychological science.
  • Constructed a mathematical model simulating the research-publication pipeline, including problem selection, study continuation or abandonment, and editorial acceptance criteria.
  • Informed model input parameters using survey data from social psychologists and corroborated model predictions against published psychological case studies.
  • The simulation revealed a dysfunctional publication system that generates very few published papers on questions where the null hypothesis is true.
  • Among published manuscripts addressing true null effects, the model indicated that an excessively high proportion erroneously reject the null hypothesis.

Cite This Study

Anthony G. Greenwald (1975) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc625aa1baf05934e52d6fhttps://doi.org/10.1037/h0076157
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The positivity trap: is a bias against null results in research literature holding back science?2025
  2. 2Confidence - and clinical importance - in research findings1990 · 13 citations
  3. 3Balanced examination of positive publication bias impact2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4When Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Is Unsuitable for Research: A Reassessment2017 · 296 citations
  5. 5Comments and recommendations regarding the hypothesis testing controversy2007 · 20 citations