Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Both psychometric evaluations supported ABILHAND as a robust manual ability PRO measure for MS. Rasch measurement methods were more informative and, consistent with its role of detecting anomalies, identified ways of advancing further ABILHAND's measurement performance to reduce any potential for type II errors in clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barrett et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: