Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Our aim was to prospectively evaluate inter- and intra-observer agreement between Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classifications and Tsukuba elasticity scores (TSs) of breast lesions. The study included 164 breast lesions (63 malignant, 101 benign). The BI-RADS classification and TS of each breast lesion was assessed by the examiner and twice by three reviewers at an interval of 2 months. Weighted κ values for inter-observer agreement ranged from moderate to substantial for BI-RADS classification (κ = 0.585-0.738) and was substantial for TS (κ = 0.608-0.779). Intra-observer agreement was almost perfect for ultrasound (US) BI-RADS (κ = 0.847-0.872) and TS (κ = 0.879-0.914). Overall, individual reviewers are highly self-consistent (almost perfect intra-observer agreement) with respect to BI-RADS classification and TS, whereas inter-observer agreement was moderate to substantial. Comprehensive training is essential for achieving high agreement and minimizing the impact of subjectivity. Our results indicate that breast US and real-time elastography can achieve high diagnostic performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schwab et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: