Key result
Ultrafast ultrasound cuts regurgitant volume measurement error by ~38 percentage points vs focused PISA.
Why the study?
Does ultrafast ultrasound using multi-point planar disk velocity integration reduce regurgitant volume measurement error compared to focused-wave PISA in an in-vitro mitral regurgitation phantom?
Does ultrafast ultrasound using multi-point planar disk velocity integration reduce regurgitant volume measurement error compared to focused-wave PISA in an in-vitro mitral regurgitation phantom?
Ultrafast ultrasound with multi-point planar disk velocity integration markedly reduces regurgitant volume estimation error compared to conventional focused-wave PISA in an in-vitro mitral regurgitation model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ultrafast multi-point MR assessment may refine quantification; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
Mitral regurgitation (MR) severity is assessed by measuring the regurgitant volume (RVol) with echocardiography using the proximal iso-velocity surface area (PISA) method. The low temporal resolution of focused ultrasound, the assumption of hemispheric iso-velocity contours, and the use of a single point to assess the velocity are the pitfalls of this method. This study evaluates a novel method using ultrafast ultrasound, and multiple points for velocity assessment without the aforementioned geometrical assumption to provide a more accurate RVol measurement. A left heart mock system, comprised of an orifice simulating MR, was filled with water mixed with cellulose. RVols from 20 mL to 70 mL with increments of 10 mL, were delivered by a pulsatile pump which was the reference. Data were acquired at 6000 frames/s by a cardiac phased array probe emitting ultrafast diverging waves, connected to an ultrafast scanner as well as a clinical system emitting focused waves. RVols were computed with the surface integral of the velocity through a planar disk at the input of the orifice with ultrafast transmission (u-PD) and PISA method with focused waves (f-PISA). The error of the two methods was compared. u-PD showed a significant lower error values than f-PISA (18.6 ± 11.5% and 56.5 ± 4.9%, respectively, p < 0.001). This study demonstrates that ultrafast ultrasound can provide accurate multi-point estimates of RVol in a model of MR by leveraging the complete axial velocity mapping at high temporal resolution. Its complementary role to PISA method will be evaluated in future clinical studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buffle et al. (2026) studied Mitral regurgitation (in-vitro pulsatile flow phantom). Ultrafast ultrasound transmission using surface integral of velocity through a planar disk (u-PD) at 6000 frames/s vs. Focused wave ultrasound using proximal iso-velocity surface area method (f-PISA) was evaluated on Percentage error in regurgitant volume (RVol) measurement compared to a pulsatile pump reference (p=< 0.001). Ultrafast ultrasound (u-PD) yielded significantly lower regurgitant volume measurement error than focused-wave PISA (18.6 ± 11.5% vs 56.5 ± 4.9%, p < 0.001) in an in-vitro MR phantom.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: