Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluation reveals accuracy of the Lifestat 1600 Pulse Oximeter in measuring oxygen levels, suggesting clinical reliability.
This study evaluated the accuracy of the SaO 2 measured by the Physio-Control Lifestat 1600 Pulse Oximeter. Method: We evaluated the accuracy of this oximeter in the SaO 2 range of 75-100% in 9 normal, healthy, Caucasian volunteers, who had blood-sampling catheters placed in their radial arteries. Hypoxemia was produced by a rebreathing technique, normoxemia by having the subjects breathe room air, and hyperoxemia by having them breathe supplemental oxygen. After the subject's SaO 2 stabilized at the desired level, a pulse oximeter SaO 2 reading was taken and a simultaneously drawn arterial blood sample was analyzed on an IL282 CO-Oximeter for SaO 2 , carboxyhemoglobin (COHb), and methemoglobin (metHb). Results: In the 114 data sets collected, the mean (± SD) Physio-Control SaO 2 was 87.9 ± 6.6% and the mean IL282 SaO 2 was 88.2 ± 6.4% (significantly different: P = 0.03). The mean COHb was 2.5 ± 0.5%, and the mean metHb was 0.5 ± 0.2%. There was a 0.97 correlation between the Physio-Control and the IL282-SaO 2 values. The limits of agreement for the Physio-Control SaO 2 were ± 3%. That is, the Physio-Control SaO 2 tended to be within 3 percentage points of the IL282 SaO 2 . Conclusions: Although the difference between the mean SaO 2 values produced by the pulse oximeter and the CO-Oximeter was statistically significant, we consider it too small to be clinically important. When COHb and metHb levels are low, as they were in this normal population, the Physio-Control Lifestat 1600 Pulse Oximeter is acceptably accurate in the SaO 2 range of 75-100%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hess et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: