Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This essay proposes strategies for inquiry-led planning in projects, enhancing future-making practices.
• Enriches project front-end scholarship with insights on future-making. • Acknowledges both demands for commitment and provisional understanding of futures. • Proposes five strategies for the project front-end that mobilize insights on future-making as inquiry. • Strategies address timing, sequencing, abandonment, flexibility, and inclusion. • Establishes research agenda to enable more inquiry-led planning in projects. Future-making scholarship frames the future as something iteratively constructed through practices of interpretation and negotiation. The project front-end literature, by contrast, is dominated by rationalist assumptions treating planning as a vehicle to enable ‘lock-in’ to preferred outcomes early in a project. To bring these literatures into dialogue, we theorize the project front-end as a space in which provisional representations of the future intersect with institutional demands for early commitments. Drawing on practice-based perspectives and pragmatist inquiry, we propose five strategies to mobilize insights on future-making as inquiry in the project front-end: (1) strategic timing, (2) staged sequencing, (3) potential abandonment, (4) design flexibility, and (5) participatory inclusion. We conclude this essay by outlining a research agenda to enable more inquiry-led planning in projects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harrison et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: