This theoretical method investigates pseudo-trust in group decision-making, suggesting improvements for decision-makers' consensus processes.
As a theoretical method for solving complex real-life problems, group decision-making (GDM), along with the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, has led to intricate and complex decision-making situations. This has contributed to the rise and rapid evolution of complex large-scale GDM (LSGDM). In the LSGDM process, the reasonable grouping of decision-makers (DMs) and reaching a consensus are the core links to obtain the optimal decision-making scheme, and these rely heavily on mutual trust among DMs. However, in reality, not all trust is real and effective, and pseudo-trust is a common phenomenon. As such, identifying and managing pseudo-trust behavior by DMs has become a challenge. This study investigates the influence of pseudo-trust on DMs' dimensionality reduction and consensus process and proposes a social network LSGDM method based on feature selection and pseudo-trust behavior. Specifically, it proposes a leader feature selection based on a dual trust relationship to address the efficiency and rationality challenges in large-scale DMs' dimensionality reduction. Through this study, we provide a clear concept of pseudo-trust behavior and create a quantitative assessment system. Furthermore, an adaptive consensus model based on pseudo-trust behavior is constructed to achieve its effective identification and management. Finally, the effectiveness, practicability, and superiority of the proposed method are proven by selecting real-world cases from the UCI database, combined with experimental and comparative analyses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: