This analysis explores how higher-order collaborations enhance network effectiveness in crisis response, suggesting improved strategies for emergencies.
Collaboration among social groups influences how communities respond to crises. However, there is limited understanding of how cross-group collaboration evolves during crises and how it affects network effectiveness. Here we propose a topological framework based on zigzag persistence to track higher-order group collaborations as time-varying simplicial complexes. Using 6.6 million volunteer activity records from Shenzhen, China, we characterize how pandemic waves and urban characteristics affect higher-order collaboration. We then evaluate these structures against an effectiveness metric, using a Shenzhen-based agent-based model and the global MapSwipe crisis-mapping platform for validation, finding that collaboration structures beyond pairwise interactions are more strongly associated with effectiveness than standard connectivity measures. These findings suggest that higher-order collaborations are a generic feature of crisis response and can inform strategies to improve collective action during large-scale emergencies. Effective cross-group collaboration is crucial during crises, yet its evolving dynamics and impact on network effectiveness remain poorly understood. Here, the authors employ a topological framework based on zigzag persistence applied to city-scale datasets associated with pandemic waves in Shenzhen, China, and reveal that higher-order collaborations are a generic feature of effective crisis response, offering insights for optimizing collective action in emergencies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: