Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture improves symbolic law discovery in physics, indicating wider grammar coverage is achievable.
Symbolic regression systems recover physical laws from data but are fundamentally limited by their search grammar: any law whose canonical form lies outside the hand-designed template set cannot be discovered regardless of loss function quality. PIR-JEPA addresses this grammar coverage problem by integrating a Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture physics manifold prior with a score-based diffusion candidate generator into the Physics Intermediate Representation (PIR) framework. The JEPA prior operates in latent expression space, biasing candidate generation toward physically plausible expression forms outside the hand-designed grammar. Candidates are scored additively — s_total = s_OT + 0.2·s_JEPA — so no grammar candidate is ever hard-rejected. Validated on a purpose-designed out-of-grammar benchmark task, oog_damped_oscillator (F = −kx − bv|v|, quadratic drag), where the v|v| term is provably outside all current PIR-Bench grammar templates. Baseline PIR achieves 0% discovery rate (MAE = 0.808); PIR-JEPA achieves 80% DR (4/5 seeds) with 100× MAE reduction (MAE = 0.008). A V-JEPA ablation (100 vs 50 candidates) produces identical 80% DR, confirming that sampling width is not the bottleneck — diffusion manifold coverage is the path to 100% DR. All 20 in-grammar PIR-Bench tasks maintain 100% DR with JEPA active. A key property of JEPA exploration is hidden physics sensitivity: JEPA runtime on in-grammar tasks scales with expression class density in latent space. Kepler's law requires ~40 min/seed vs 0.8 min baseline — because the diffusion sampler generates a dense catalogue of near-Kepler modifications (r^(3/2+δ), r^(3/2)log r, etc.) corresponding to dark matter, fifth force, and extra dimension corrections. The scoring margin Δs between rank-1 and rank-2 candidates is a sensitivity metric for detecting deviations from known physics without prior knowledge of the deviation's form. Related records: PIR Architecture v3 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19130847), PIR-Bench v3.1 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19130521), PhysicsGPT v3 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19130163).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hanif Muhammad (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: