Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 15, 2002Journal of Clinical Oncology

Dronabinol Versus Megestrol Acetate Versus Combination Therapy for Cancer-Associated Anorexia: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AJAminah JatoiMayo ClinicHWHarold E. WindschitlCreighton University
Charles L. Loprinzi
Charles L. LoprinziMayo Clinic

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Jatoi et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dca089a5c75be4cfe533bahttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2002.20.2.567
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Δ<sup>9</sup>‐Tetrahydrocannabinol As An Antiemetic For Patients Receiving Cancer Chemotherapy. A Pilot Study1981 · 29 citations
  2. 2Marijuana as antiemetic medicine: a survey of oncologists' experiences and attitudes.1991 · 111 citations
  3. 3Phase III evaluation of four doses of megestrol acetate as therapy for patients with cancer anorexia and/or cachexia.1993 · 226 citations
  4. 4Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of cisplatin and etoposide plus megestrol acetate/placebo in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group study.1996 · 139 citations
  5. 5Randomized Comparison of Megestrol Acetate Versus Dexamethasone Versus Fluoxymesterone for the Treatment of Cancer Anorexia/Cachexia1999 · 344 citations