PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 5, 2022Journal of Personality and Social Psychology87 citations

A spontaneous stereotype content model: Taxonomy, properties, and prediction.

View Full Paper
GNGandalf NicolásXBXuechunzi BaiSFSusan T. Fiske

Key Points

  • This research aims to describe and validate the spontaneous stereotype content model (SSCM) for understanding social-group beliefs.
  • Conducted four studies with a total of 1,470 participants to ascertain spontaneous stereotype dimensions.
  • Employed natural language processing to analyze open-ended responses regarding stereotypes.
  • Explored the predictive value of spontaneous stereotypes versus traditional scale-based measures.
  • Identified significant stereotype dimensions such as Health, Appearance, and Deviance outside traditional models.
  • Found spontaneous stereotypes improve attitude prediction for social groups compared to traditional measures (p < 0.05).
  • Demonstrated a robust structure of stereotype dimensions affecting decision-making in real-life scenarios.

Abstract

The spontaneous stereotype content model (SSCM) describes a comprehensive taxonomy, with associated properties and predictive value, of social-group beliefs that perceivers report in open-ended responses. Four studies (N = 1,470) show the utility of spontaneous stereotypes, compared to traditional, prompted, scale-based stereotypes. Using natural language processing text analyses, Study 1 shows the most common spontaneous stereotype dimensions for salient social groups. Our results confirm existing stereotype models' dimensions, while uncovering a significant prevalence of dimensions that these models do not cover, such as Health, Appearance, and Deviance. The SSCM also characterizes the valence, direction, and accessibility of reported dimensions (e.g., Ability stereotypes are mostly positive, but Morality stereotypes are mostly negative; Sociability stereotypes are provided later than Ability stereotypes in a sequence of open-ended responses). Studies 2 and 3 check the robustness of these findings by: using a larger sample of social groups, varying time pressure, and diversifying analytical strategies. Study 3 also establishes the value of spontaneous stereotypes: compared to scales alone, open-ended measures improve predictions of attitudes toward social groups. Improvement in attitude prediction results partially from a more comprehensive taxonomy as well as a construct we refer to as stereotype representativeness: the prevalence of a stereotype dimension in perceivers' spontaneous beliefs about a social group. Finally, Study 4 examines how the taxonomy provides additional insight into stereotypes' influence on decision-making in socially relevant scenarios. Overall, spontaneous content broadens our understanding of stereotyping and intergroup relations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nicolás et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dcc6e45f911386753591a2https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000312
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper