Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The EBPAS-36 has adequate psychometric properties both in US and Norwegian samples, hence indicating cross-cultural validity. It is a brief, pragmatic, and more user-friendly instrument than the EBPAS-50, yet maintains a broad scope by retaining the original 12 measurement domains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rye et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: