Why the study?
Does routine nerve conduction studies (NCS) cause adverse effects on device function in patients with implanted cardiac devices?
Does routine nerve conduction studies (NCS) cause adverse effects on device function in patients with implanted cardiac devices?
Routine nerve conduction studies appear safe in patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers with bipolar sensing configurations and defibrillators, as they do not interfere with device function.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports no NCS interference with implanted cardiac devices in this case; leaves open generalizability pending larger studies.
Patients with implanted cardiac devices and their physicians may defer important electrodiagnostic testing because of anxiety about potential negative effects on the device. To determine the safety of routine nerve conduction studies (NCS) in this population, 10 patients with permanent dual-chamber pacemakers of various types and five patients with implanted cardiac defibrillators (ICD) underwent nerve stimulation at sites commonly used during NCS. The implanted cardiac device was interrogated before and after the study and there was continuous monitoring of the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) and atrial and ventricular electrograms. Electrical impulses generated during routine NCS were never detected by the sensing amplifier and did not affect the programmed settings of the implanted cardiac device. We conclude that routine NCS is safe in patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers with bipolar sensing configurations and defibrillators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schoeck et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: