Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
On a sample of U.S. urbanized areas in 2000, we test theoretical hypotheses of the effect of land‐use controls on the spatial size of urban areas. We find that minimum lot‐size zoning and maximum FAR restrictions expand the urban area, while maximum lot‐size zoning, urban growth boundaries, minimum square footage limits, maximum building permit restrictions, minimum person per room controls, and impact fees contract the urban area. All of these findings are consistent with theoretical predictions although the effect of urban growth boundaries and minimum square footage limits are not statistically significant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geshkov et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: