⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

June 19, 2020JAMA Network OpenOpen Access

Comparison of Patient-Reported vs Physician-Estimated Angina in Patients Undergoing Elective and Urgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

No abstract yet

We only have this paper's title and publication details.

Read it at the source→

Abstract

from studies such as ISCHEMIA

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Figures from the paper

Published by JAMA Network Open · CC BY

Cite This Study

Saxon et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dcdede854f360ad635948f https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7406

Topics

Percutaneous coronary intervention

Women and heart disease

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart DiseaseOriginal Research · 2017 · 625 citations
2Health-Status Outcomes with Invasive or Conservative Care in Coronary DiseaseRCT · 2020 · 473 citations
3Effect of PCI on Quality of Life in Patients with Stable Coronary DiseaseRCT · 2008 · 733 citations
4Predictors of Physician Under-Recognition of Angina in Outpatients With Stable Coronary Artery Diseasecross-sectional · 2016 · 64 citations
5Comparison of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire With Daily Angina Diary in the TERISA Clinical Trialcohort · 2014 · 98 citations