Why the study?
Recurrent misconceptions persist regarding the VExUS score, notably misguided attempts to correlate it to volume status or re-interpret it in certain pathologies.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review article
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinicians should avoid equating VExUS with volume status; leaves open its validated role in venous congestion assessment.
There has been a significant interest in venous congestion in recent years, among which the VExUS score has been prominent, both in clinical practice and research efforts. We have noted some recurrent misconceptions among clinicians which are also reflected in certain research efforts. Notably, the misguided attempt to correlate VExUS to volume status, which is only one of the factors influencing it, as well as attempts to re-interpret VExUS in the context of certain pathologies, which reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of its circulatory perspective. In this article we review the physiological basis of the VExUS assessment as a measure and marker of venous congestion from the organs' standpoint and its role as part of the emerging concept of fluid tolerance, in hopes to address these misconceptions for clinicians and for important further studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rola et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: