Why the study?
Studies reporting higher anticoagulation complication rates in cancer-associated VTE are relatively old and reflect the era of vitamin K inhibitors.
Do patients with cancer-associated VTE have higher rates of VTE recurrence and bleeding compared to non-cancer patients when managed with contemporary anticoagulation protocols?
Do patients with cancer-associated VTE have higher rates of VTE recurrence and bleeding compared to non-cancer patients when managed with contemporary anticoagulation protocols?
In a contemporary registry with high direct oral anticoagulant utilization, cancer patients with VTE had higher recurrence and major bleeding rates than non-cancer patients, though these complication rates are substantially lower than historical vitamin K antagonist era values.
May warrant enhanced monitoring for cancer-associated VTE; leaves open optimal DOAC strategies in dedicated trials.
Patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE) have higher complication rates of anticoagulation. However, studies supporting this data are relatively old reflecting the era of vitamin K inhibitors.To assess VTE recurrence, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) in patients (March 1, 2013 to April 30, 2023) with cancer-associated VTE and patients without cancer, the prospective Mayo Clinic Thrombophilia Clinic Registry was analyzed.Over the study period, 4,711 patients with acute VTE were enrolled including 2,064 patients with cancer (mean age 62.5 ± 12.4, 46% female) and 2,647 patients without cancer (mean age 59.4 ± 16.0, 45% female). The most common cancers were gastrointestinal (n = 423, 21%), pancreatic (n = 287, 14%), and genitourinary (n = 198, 10%). Direct oral anticoagulants were used in 1,339 (65%) cancer and in 1,952 (74%) non-cancer patients. Among cancer patients, 12-month Kaplan-Meier probability of VTE recurrence was 2.4-fold greater (7.1% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001) compared with the non-cancer group, including higher recurrent leg deep vein thrombosis (3.0% vs. 1.4%; p = 0.002) and pulmonary embolism (3.5% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001). Patients with cancer also had 2.1-fold greater risk of major bleeding (6.3% vs. 3.0%; p < 0.001) including bleeding from the gastrointestinal tract (3.0 vs. 1.4, p = 0.01) compared with patients without cancer. Clinically relevant non-major bleeding events were similar between the groups.In this large prospective registry of VTE management, patients with cancer had significantly higher rates of VTE recurrence and major bleeding compared with patients without cancer, yet the rate of complications are substantially smaller relative to historic values of a prior vitamin K antagonist era.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cassianni et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: