PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1983Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica133 citations

Incidence and Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis Associated with Pregnancy

View Full Paper
AKA Kierkegaard

Structured PICO

What is the incidence of DVT in pregnancy and how reliable are clinical signs compared to objective diagnosis with ascending phlebography?

P
Population
14,869 obstetrical patients (pregnant and puerperal women)
I
Intervention
Ascending phlebography
C
Comparator
Clinical signs and symptoms
O
Outcome
Incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT)

Objective diagnosis of DVT using methods like ascending phlebography is crucial in pregnant women due to the high unreliability of clinical signs and symptoms.

Abstract

The incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), diagnosed by ascending phlebography, has been calculated retrospectively in a group of 14 869 obstetrical patients. The incidence was calculated to 0.13 per thousand antepartum and 0.61 per thousand postpartum. The study revealed that clinical signs and symptoms of thrombosis are very unreliable in pregnant women but more reliable in puerperal women. It is concluded that objective diagnosis of thrombosis is important in pregnant women, and ascending phlebography is a rewarding objective method to use in pregnant women.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

A Kierkegaard (1983) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd13d90de68e8319e53dfbhttps://doi.org/10.3109/00016348309155799
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper