Why the study?
Is the clinical diagnosis of leg vein thrombosis less accurate in women taking oral contraceptives compared to those not taking them?
Is the clinical diagnosis of leg vein thrombosis less accurate in women taking oral contraceptives compared to those not taking them?
Clinical diagnosis of leg vein thrombosis is frequently erroneous, especially in women on oral contraceptives, highlighting the need for objective diagnostic techniques like Doppler ultrasound.
Clinical leg vein thrombosis diagnosis shows low Doppler confirmation in contraceptive users; leaves open reduced accuracy versus non-users and need for objective confirmation.
Most studies demonstrating an increased risk of venous thromboembolism in women on oral contraceptives are based on clinical manifestations of the disease. Because of the fallibility of the clinical diagnosis of suspected leg vein thrombosis, Doppler ultrasonic evaluation (with a 93% accuracy compared to venography) was performed for clinical manifestations in deep vein thrombosis in 54 women taking birth control pills and 75 women of similar age who were not on contraceptives. The clinical diagnosis was confirmed by Doppler in only 16.7% of the women taking contraceptives and 30.7% of women not taking contraceptives (P = 0.052). This study suggests that the clinical diagnosis of leg vein thrombosis is frequently erroneous, particularly in women taking oral contraceptives. Future investigations reporting venous thromboembolism associated with oral contraceptives should be based on diagnoses validated by accurate objective techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barnes et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: