Key result
Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy in patients with chronic thromboembolic disease was associated with 0% in-hospital mortality and shorter hospital and ICU lengths of stay compared with a CTEPH cohort (P<0.001).
Why the study?
The safety and efficacy of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy in chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED) are not well characterized compared with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).
Is pulmonary thromboendarterectomy safe and effective for improving hemodynamics in patients with chronic thromboembolic disease compared to those with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension?
Cohort (n=1,033)
Is pulmonary thromboendarterectomy safe and effective for improving hemodynamics in patients with chronic thromboembolic disease compared to those with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension?
Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy is safe and effective for patients with chronic thromboembolic disease, offering excellent in-hospital outcomes and hemodynamic improvements comparable to or better than in CTEPH.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support pulmonary thromboendarterectomy in CTED; leaves open need for prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED) is characterized by pulmonary vascular thromboembolic occlusions without elevation in pulmonary artery pressures or pulmonary vascular resistance at rest. Many patients have dyspnea on exertion despite normal resting hemodynamics and symptomatic improvement after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy surgery. We hypothesize that the safety and efficacy of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy in CTED will be similar to that in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), which currently has a better characterized risk-benefit profile. METHODS: Patients who underwent pulmonary thromboendarterectomy for CTED from 2009 through 2022 had preoperative and postoperative pulmonary hemodynamics and postoperative course (n = 163) compared with a reference CTEPH cohort who underwent pulmonary thromboendarterectomy from 2017 to 2022 (n = 870). Preoperative rest hemodynamics were compared with both preoperative exercise and postoperative rest hemodynamics in patients with CTED who had measurements for all 3 conditions. RESULTS: ; 3.6 [IQR, 3.1-4.4], 2.7 [IQR, 2.1-3.6], 4.8 [IQR, 3.7-6.0] mL/mm Hg; preoperative rest, exercise, and postoperative for mean pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and compliance; P < .001 for all comparisons, mean [SD] if normally distributed, otherwise median [IQR]). CTED patients had no in-hospital mortality and shorter hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay (P < .001 for both) compared with the CTEPH cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy is safe and well-tolerated in patients with CTED, improving pulmonary hemodynamics and pulmonary artery compliance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bird et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED) (n=1,033). Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy vs. Reference CTEPH cohort was evaluated on In-hospital mortality and hospital/ICU length of stay (p=<.001). Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy in patients with chronic thromboembolic disease was associated with 0% in-hospital mortality and shorter hospital and ICU lengths of stay compared with a CTEPH cohort (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: