The Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation Score for Patients With Distal Radius Fractures

Monique M. J. Walenkamp; Robert-Jan de Muinck Keizer; J. Carel Goslings; Lara M. Vos; Melvin P. Rosenwasser; Niels W. L. Schep

doi:10.1007/s11999-015-4376-9

June 4, 2015Clinical Orthopaedics and Related ResearchOpen Access

The Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation Score for Patients With Distal Radius Fractures

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.

We recommend using an improvement on the PRWE of more than 11.5 points as the smallest clinically relevant difference when evaluating the effects of treatments and when performing sample-size calculations on studies of distal radius fractures.

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Walenkamp et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd2427d111c0385b35a24b https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4376-9

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

The Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation Score for Patients With Distal Radius Fractures

Abstract

Ask about this paper

Discussion

Cite This Study

The Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation Score for Patients With Distal Radius Fractures

Abstract

Ask about this paper

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading