Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 1, 2001Health Technology AssessmentOpen Access

Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SBSara BrookesAt BristolEWElise WhitleyMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences UnitTPT. J. PetersColorado State University Pueblo

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Brookes et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd4d7927c48be1bb40cc7ehttps://doi.org/10.3310/hta5330
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effect of peer led programme for asthma education in adolescents: cluster randomised controlled trial2001 · 239 citations
  2. 2Assessing apparent treatment—covariate interactions in randomized clinical trials1985 · 95 citations
  3. 3Sifting the evidence---what's wrong with significance tests? Another comment on the role of statistical methods2001 · 1,508 citations
  4. 4The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2001 · 2,561 citations