Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided microwave (MWA), radiofrequency (RF), and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in the treatment of uterine leiomyoma and to provide a suggestion for the selection of clinical treatment of uterine leiomyoma. The retrospective cohort studies on the efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound in treating uterine leiomyoma was collected through a literature search in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library, Scopus, and Web of Science, and selected according to the specified inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. Evaluate the study quality, extract relevant data, and RevMan 5.4.1 was used to conduct this meta-analysis. Compared with HIFU therapy, the complete or partial ablation rate and recurrence rate of uterine leiomyoma treated with RFA/MWA were statistically different (P < 0.05). Compared with RF, the overall efficacy of HIFU in treating uterine leiomyoma was not as good as that of RF. There was no significant difference between the RFA therapy and the MWA. HIFU still has mild and short-term complications, such as abdominal pain, bloody vaginal discharge, sacral pain, and fever. Although myomectomy is usually the first choice for uterine preservation, RFA/MWA and HIFU have also been shown to relieve clinical symptoms significantly, shorten treatment time, reduce complications, and improve prognosis.
Fan et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: