Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The main finding of our study was that DMC was not associated with an increased risk of revision for infection compared to standard THA. THA revision for infection was not correlated to the type of cup used. It is mandatory to report on comparable types of patients when comparing outcomes. For similar patient profiles (i) DMC-THAs were not revised more often for infection than FC-THA (ii) FC-THAs were revised 4 times more for dislocation than DMC-THA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prudhon et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: