This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
If arbitrage is costly and noise traders are active, asset prices may deviate from fundamental values for long periods of time. We use a sample of 158 closed‐end funds to show that noise‐trader sentiment, as proxied by retail‐investor flows, leads to fluctuations in the discount. Nevertheless, we reject the hypothesis that noise‐trader risk is the cause of the long‐run discount. Instead we find that funds which are more difficult to arbitrage have larger discounts, due to: (1) the censoring of the discount by the arbitrage bounds, and (2) the freedom of managers to increase charges when arbitrage is costly.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gemmill et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: