Key result
SMART Pass filtering is linked to ~33% fewer inappropriate shocks in S-ICD patients.
Why the study?
Use of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) is increasing, but evidence from industry-independent and unselected populations remains limited.
Observational (n=4,924)
Yes
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
In a large, nationwide, unselected French cohort, S-ICD therapy demonstrated a 5-year inappropriate shock rate of 13.8% and early battery depletion in 10.8%, providing real-world long-term safety data.
Kerkouri et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation (n=4,924). Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) was evaluated on Inappropriate shocks at 5 years. In a nationwide French cohort of 4,924 patients with an S-ICD, the 5-year cumulative incidence of inappropriate shocks was 13.8%, which was significantly reduced by SMART Pass filtering (HR 0.67).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: