Key result
Complete RBBB is linked to vascular endothelial dysfunction rather than serving as a benign finding.
Why the study?
Complete right bundle branch block (CRBBB) is common and generally has a good prognosis, but recent studies suggest it is related to arteriosclerosis and cardiovascular risk, prompting assessment of its association with vascular function.
Is complete right bundle branch block associated with endothelial dysfunction compared to normal QRS duration?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,308)
Is complete right bundle branch block associated with endothelial dysfunction compared to normal QRS duration?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Complete right bundle branch block is independently associated with endothelial dysfunction, suggesting it may not be a completely benign electrocardiographic finding.
BACKGROUND: Complete right bundle branch block (CRBBB) is a common electrocardiographic finding even in healthy people and generally has a good prognosis. However, recent studies have shown that CRBBB is related to arteriosclerosis and cardiovascular risk. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the association between CRBBB and vascular function. METHODS: This study included a total of 2,313 individuals. After applying the exclusion criteria, 1,308 individuals were included in the final analysis. We evaluated the endothelial function assessed by flow-mediated vasodilation and vascular smooth muscle function assessed by nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation in 55 individuals with CRBBB (34 men; mean age: 62.6 ± 16.6 years) and 1,253 individuals with normal QRS duration (527 men; mean age: 66.6 ± 14.0 years). RESULTS: Flow-mediated vasodilation was significantly lower in patients with CRBBB than that in those with normal QRS duration (3.2% [1.6%-4.7%] vs 4.6% [2.6%-6.7%]; P < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, CRBBB was significantly associated with endothelial dysfunction (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.01-3.36; P = 0.047). Although nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation was significantly lower in individuals with CRBBB than in those with normal QRS duration (11.5% [7.9%-14.9%] vs 13.1% [9.6%-17.3%] P = 0.024), no significant association was observed between CRBBB and vascular smooth muscle dysfunction based on the multivariable analysis (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.53-2.22; P = 0.816). CONCLUSIONS: CRBBB was shown to be associated with endothelial dysfunction. These findings suggest that CRBBB should not be regarded as a benign electrocardiography finding from a vascular function standpoint (A study of clinical usefulness of vascular function; UMIN000039512).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mizobuchi et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Complete right bundle branch block (n=1,308). Complete right bundle branch block vs. Normal QRS duration was evaluated on Endothelial dysfunction (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.01-3.36, p=0.047). Complete right bundle branch block was significantly associated with endothelial dysfunction compared to normal QRS duration (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.01-3.36; P=0.047).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: