Key result
Left atrioventricular coupling index fails to independently predict device-detected atrial fibrillation after age adjustment.
Why the study?
Predicting atrial fibrillation in high-risk populations like embolic stroke of undetermined source is important because anticoagulation might reduce the annual stroke recurrence risk of 5%.
Does a higher left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI) independently predict future implantable loop recorder-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation in patients with an embolic stroke of undetermined source?
Cohort (n=230)
No
Does a higher left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI) independently predict future implantable loop recorder-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation in patients with an embolic stroke of undetermined source?
Although higher left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI) was associated with ILR-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation on univariable analysis in ESUS patients, this effect is mediated by age and LACI was not an independent predictor after multivariable adjustment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LACI should not yet guide AF screening in ESUS; leaves open its independent value beyond age in larger cohorts.
The prediction of atrial fibrillation in high-risk populations is an important research area of modern atrial fibrillation care. One such population is the embolic stroke of undetermined source population, where appropriate anticoagulation might help to reduce the annual stroke recurrence risk of 5%. In this study, individuals were categorised according to their tertile of left atrioventricular coupling index, a composite echocardiographic parameter that reflects both left atrial and ventricular size. Its association with the detection of implantable loop recorder detected sub-clinical atrial fibrillation was investigated. A retrospective single-centre cohort study was performed. A total of 296 embolic stroke of undetermined source patients, referred for implantable loop recorder, who also underwent echocardiography were screened. Of these, 230 cases had echocardiograms of sufficient quality to measure left atrioventricular coupling index. Patients were categorised according to their left atrioventricular coupling index tertile, with tertile 1 being less than 16.97, tertile 2 being 16.97-23.9, and tertile 3 being greater than 23.9. Patients in the third left atrioventricular coupling tertile were more likely to develop atrial fibrillation of any duration, with a 1.9 fold increased univariable hazard ratio though this association was not significant in longer duration of atrial fibrillation episode. This effect was no longer significant with stepwise multivariable analysis, suggesting that age was primarily mediating the effect seen in this study. Left atrioventricular coupling index was not an independent predictor of future implantable loop recorder-detected atrial fibrillation after adjustment for age in this cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chattopadhyay et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) in patients with sinus rhythm (n=230). Left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI) Tertile 3 (>23.9) vs. LACI Tertile 1 (<16.97) was evaluated on Subsequent detection of subclinical atrial fibrillation (SCAF) of any duration on implantable loop recorder (ILR) (HR 1.418, 95% CI 0.839-2.396, p=0.19). Left atrioventricular coupling index (tertile 3 vs 1) did not independently predict ILR-detected atrial fibrillation after age adjustment.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: